ExampleE-001

Lifetime Warranty Case

A product is promoted with a lifetime warranty, while linked terms quietly reduce the real warranty period to three days.

Why it matters

The case shows how a strong promise and a hidden condition can create both poor disclosure and a direct contradiction.

A hidden term should not erase the ordinary meaning of a prominent promise.
Exact OETS wordingOpen the citable version

A prominent lifetime promise conflicts with a three-day warranty condition hidden inside linked terms.

The plain explanation above is the best place to begin. This version is here when precision or citation matters.

What stands out

  • The headline creates a strong expectation of long-term support.
  • The three-day condition changes the core value of that promise.
  • The limitation receives far less attention than the claim.
  • The two messages cannot reasonably be understood as the same offer.
Likely OETS view

This looks like a serious disclosure failure and a contradictory representation. The hidden term does not fairly repair the prominent promise.

Transparency

Change history

Meaningful wording changes stay visible.
v1.0

Initial draft.